| Calvin’s Doctrine of Predestination |
|
|
|
Adore with astonishment the secret counsel of God, through which, those which seemed good to Him are elected, and the other rejected![1] That was our believer / theologian’s approach to predestination. He prostrated his mind and heart before the God of the Word; and because he heard God speaking so clearly of His eternal predestination, Calvin believed it, taught it, and preached it! Calvin practiced Sola Scriptura! That reforming principle demanded predestination; and it delivered us from bondage to Rome’s semi-Pelagianism! Predestination, you see, is both the fountain of grace and the death knell to human merit; predestination is what gives us the other great solas of the Reformation: grace alone, in Christ alone, through faith alone, to God’s glory alone. GRACE ALONE! That is the triumphant cry of the Reformation. Calvin took us to its source – the eternal predestination of God. He drove his peg into that mighty truth and anchored us in the free grace of God. Calvin’s doctrine of predestination stands at the very heart of the Confessions of the Reformed and Presbyterian churches.[2] The doctrines of grace, or five points of Calvinism,[3] have rightly become the common-places for biblical Christianity. Calvin’s Doctrine OutlinedFirst off, let’s glance at Calvin’s big picture. Calvin locates predestination in the eternal covenant between God as Father, and God the Son appointed to the office of Mediator. He writes in the Institutes: The elect are said to have been the Father’s before he gave them to his only begotten Son. …the Father’s gift is the beginning of our reception into the surety and protection of Christ…. [T]he whole world does not belong to its Creator except that grace rescues from God’s curse and wrath and eternal death a limited number who would otherwise perish. But the world itself is left to its own destruction, to which it has been destined… That is the pattern of Calvin’s thought, a pattern from which he never deviates.
Following the divine logic of Romans 8:29-30, Calvin traces grace from unconditional election like a stream from its fountain-head. At times he follows it down to us from eternal predestination, through effectual calling, to justification; and he shows us that it must issue, without fail, in glorification! (Institutes, 3.21.7). At other times he teaches us to trace grace back upstream from faith, to effectual calling, and from calling to Christ in whom is our adoption by the Father. This is how he put it: God calls and justifies, in His own time, those whom He predestinated to these blessings before the foundation of the world. (CC, p.112) Effectual calling is a testimony and sign that manifests election (Institutes, 3.21.7), and “faith is the special gift of God, and by that gift election is manifested to, and ratified in, the soul that receives it” (CC , p.97). Furthermore, any glimmer of holiness in the saints is referred, “to the election of God, as waters are traced to their fountain” (CC, p.154). Salvation is, therefore, the working of God’s purest grace – from beginning to end! This says something about Calvin’s understanding of grace. Grace, in Calvin’s mind, always “delivers” God’s children into Christ’s hands and possession (CC, p.51). Much ado has been made of Calvin’s mention of a “common” or general kindness of God manifest in His providential dealings with all His creation. But whenever Calvin’s context has anything to do, even remotely, with salvation or the gospel, he has grace hooked into predestination. For Calvin, when it comes to salvation, the idea of grace flowing to those whom God has passed by and left outside Christ as objects of His righteous hatred – was a falsehood to be demolished.[12] Calvin sees a predestinating God – the omnipotent volitional being – who is eternally putting forth His favour to Christ and those particular sinners He has chosen to eternal life in Him. He sees grace as God’s purposeful, personal, irresistible, saving favour.[13] And it also says something about Calvin’s view of what is God’s purpose, or desire, with the preaching of the gospel. Calvin refutes Pighius’ idea that God sends the gospel to be preached to all men because He desires the salvation of all men.[14] What Calvin writes in response applies to any and every hint of universalism. “The great question,” he says, “lies here: Did the Lord by His eternal counsel ordain salvation for all men?”[15] Obviously not – predestination unfolded in providence proves otherwise. Therefore he concludes: the mercy of God is offered equally to those who believe and to those who believe not, so that those who are not divinely taught within are only rendered inexcusable, not saved. (CC, p.95) Calvin did not believe that the gospel is sent to all because God desires the salvation of all! He withstood that idea. Calvin believed that God desires salvation of all the elect, and because they are scattered among the reprobate, He causes His gospel to be heard by all men. He believed that the outward call is the means by which God saves His elect by grace, and brings the reprobate to their appointed end in the way of their own wicked unbelief (Institutes, 3.24.12). God’s desires are never unfulfilled. (To be continued) Rev. Chris Connors 1. Calvin, Calvin’s Calvinism, (Grand Rapids, Michigan: RFPA, 1987), p.84. “Let those who thus come to Christ remember that they are ‘vessels’ of grace, not of merit.” 2. The Westminster Confession of Faith, chapter 3 reads: I. God from all eternity did, by the most wise and holy counsel of his own will, freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass: yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established.3. Total depravity, Unconditional election, Limited atonement, Irresistible grace, Perseverance of the saints. 4. Sermons on Election and Reprobation, (New Jersey: Old Paths Publications, 1996), p.39 5. Calvin’s Calvinism, p.45. “There is, most certainly and evidently, an inseparable connection between the elect and the reprobate. So that the election, of which the apostle speaks, cannot consist unless we confess that God separated from all others certain persons whom it pleased Him thus to separate. Now, this act of God is expressed by the term predestinating.” 6. Calvin’s Calvinism, p.75. “…according to His sovereign and absolute will” – that is Calvin’s maxim. 7. Institutes, 3.23.9 And he insists, at the same time, that it is perverse for sinners to suppress the cause of their condemnation, which is nothing other than their own sin, in order to cast the blame upon God. Calvin’s point is that no sinner shall ever arrive in hell, except it be in that he walked all the way there in his own sin. 8. Institutes, 3.21.5. Calvin had a higher view of God. He saw the God of Scripture to be infinite, eternal, omnipotent, self-sufficient, sovereign. Thus his extended definition of foreknowledge as it is in God: “When we attribute foreknowledge to God, we mean that all things always were, and perpetually remain, under his eyes, so that to his knowledge there is nothing future or past, but all things are present. And they are present in such a way that he not only conceives them through ideas, as we have before us those things which our minds remember, but he truly looks upon them and discerns them as things placed before him. And this foreknowledge is extended throughout the universe to every creature.” 9. “…since among all the offspring of Adam, the Heavenly Father found nothing worthy of his election, he turned his eyes upon his Anointed, to choose from that body as members those whom he has to take into the fellowship of life. Let this reasoning, then, prevail among believers: we were adopted in Christ into the eternal inheritance because in ourselves we were not capable of such great excellence” (Institutes, 3.22.1). 10. A further point of emphasis in Calvin is adoption. Election and adoption are almost synonymous in his mind. Election is the eternal adoption of children by the Father, who opens His heart to them in and through Christ. This is the way Calvin views the relationship of the “covenant.” The covenant relation is filial – and the relationship it affords is filial love and communion. 11. Institutes, 3.1.1. Thus, when Calvin explains how the elect receive the grace of Christ, he begins with the work of “the Holy Spirit as the bond that unites us to Christ.” 12. Calvin’s Calvinism, p.75. “When Pighius holds that God’s election of grace has no reference to, or connection with, His hatred of the reprobate, I maintain that reference and connection to be a truth. Inasmuch as the just severity of God answers, in equal and common cause, to that free love with which He embraces His elect.” 13. Calvin’s Calvinism, p.150. How? “Does He bind their bodies, I pray you, with chains?” asks Calvin, “Oh, no! He works within; He takes hold of their hearts within; He moves their hearts within; and draws them by those, now, new wills of their own which He has Himself wrought in them.” 14. Calvin’s Calvinism , pp.93-94. Pighius objects: special and particular election is false, “because Christ, the Redeemer of the whole world, commanded the Gospel to be preached to all men, promiscuously, generally, and without distinction. But the Gospel is an embassy of peace, by which the world is reconciled to God, as Paul teaches. And, according to the same holy witness, it is preached that those who hear it might be saved.” 15. Calvin’s Calvinism, p.95. “It is quite manifest that all men, without difference or distinction, are outwardly called or invited to repentance and faith. It is equally evident that the same Mediator is set forth before all, as He who alone can reconcile them to the Father. But it is as fully well known that none of these things can be understood or perceived but by faith, in fulfillment of the apostle Paul’s declaration that ‘the gospel is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth;’ then what can it be to others but the ‘savour of death unto death?’ as the same apostle elsewhere powerfully expresses himself.” |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|